SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
Small business owners and farmers with land or business premises owned by their SMSF are the big losers in the draft legislation on the Better Targeted Superannuation Concession, claims the SMSFA.
.
SMSFA CEO Peter Burgess said research shows these two business communities are most likely to be adversely affected by the legislation’s proposal to tax unrealised capital gains.The SMSFA’s 17-page submission to Treasury cites many unintended consequences and anomalies in the draft bill, most of which can be traced to including unrealised capital gains in measuring earnings.“These unintended consequences are exactly the reasons why we don’t tax unrealised capital gains, and why no other country in the world taxes unrealised capital gains – it involves taxing individuals on funds they haven’t received or may never receive,” Mr Burgess said.
“It has the potential to impose significant financial stress on individuals. Certainly, this is how it will play out in the SMSF sector, with many small business operators and farmers expected to bear the brunt of the Division 296 tax.”In its submission, the SMSFA said it rejects the notion that any liquidity stress caused by the new tax measure is a failing by SMSF trustees to properly formulate the fund’s investment strategy.“In our view it is completely unreasonable to expect trustees to envisage future tax changes when formulating the fund’s investment strategy – particularly of the magnitude of the Division 296 tax,” it stated.Mr Burgess added that to ensure this measure achieves its stated objectives, it is imperative that the measure of “earnings” mirrors the traditional measure of taxable earnings as closely as possible.The SMSFA said the two-week consultation period for the draft exposure legislation was too short stating the changes proposed are significant, complex and in need of detailed review.Additionally, it claimed other measures such as how the Division 296 tax will be applied to defined benefit funds and the proposal to remove the link between a member’s total superannuation balance and the transfer balance cap, are heavily reliant upon regulations not yet released.“This affects our ability to properly consider all aspects of the proposed measures,” it said.The submission also calls for the $3 million threshold to be indexed to the Consumer Price Index in $100,000 increments.The SMSFA is urging the government to put the proposed bill on hold while it further engages with stakeholders to ensure that the resulting policy and legislation deliver an outcome that is equitable across the superannuation system.
Keeli Cambourne
19 October 2023
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access
- The Largest Empires in the World's History
- All the documents, fact sheets and downloads to do with this year’s 2025-26 Federal Budget
- Winners and Losers - Federal Budget 2025-26
- Building Australia's future and Budget Priorities
- Four SMSF breaches high on the ATO’s radar
- Home is where the super is for many Australians
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2025
- TBC increase not just about pensions
- SAR non-lodgment continues to be a concern: ATO
- Increase in prohibited loans a concern: ATO
- Retiree confidence undermined
- The Most Held Currencies in the World | 1850-2024
- Up to 700k retirees could be paying more tax than they should: SMC
- Calls for clarification on NALI/E rulings
- Australia’s economic growth set to recover in 2025
- Carer rights - interdependency relationships
- Division 296 deliberately deceptive
- Five financial steps for the new year
- How to shift into pension mode
- Best Selling BOOKS of all Time
- Preparing your kids for financial success
- Investment and economic outlook
- It’s super hump month. Make the most of it
- Know the difference between general and specific NALE
- Super funds finish 2024 with double-digit returns
- 9 Ways You Can Invest Using SMSF
- End-of-year break time for super check-up
- Most Powerful Economies in Europe | 1960-2024
Article archive
October - December 2023 archive
- Working after pension age
- Does the NALI/E punishment fit the crime?
- EPOA crucial for SMSFs, says professional adviser
- Economic and market outlook for 2024: Global summary
- Five investing tips for beginners
- Setting up the next generations of retirees
- A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
- Most Expensive Wars In History
- ATO takes hard line on in-house asset rules
- How to budget using the 50/30/20 method
- SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2023
- The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
- Teaching children about the value of money
- Most powerful countries throughout time.
- Retirement is not just about dollars
- Unfair Terms in a Standard Form Contract
- Too many businesses roll the dice on tax debt: Jordan
- Revised NALE rules ‘miss chance to clarify SMSF bugbear
- 6 simple rules will ensure a deed can be executed in all states
- Our investment and economic outlook, September 2023
- The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
- High deposit rates, but the case for equities is strong
- Most powerful LEADERS of All Time