SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
Small business owners and farmers with land or business premises owned by their SMSF are the big losers in the draft legislation on the Better Targeted Superannuation Concession, claims the SMSFA.
.
SMSFA CEO Peter Burgess said research shows these two business communities are most likely to be adversely affected by the legislation’s proposal to tax unrealised capital gains.The SMSFA’s 17-page submission to Treasury cites many unintended consequences and anomalies in the draft bill, most of which can be traced to including unrealised capital gains in measuring earnings.“These unintended consequences are exactly the reasons why we don’t tax unrealised capital gains, and why no other country in the world taxes unrealised capital gains – it involves taxing individuals on funds they haven’t received or may never receive,” Mr Burgess said.
“It has the potential to impose significant financial stress on individuals. Certainly, this is how it will play out in the SMSF sector, with many small business operators and farmers expected to bear the brunt of the Division 296 tax.”In its submission, the SMSFA said it rejects the notion that any liquidity stress caused by the new tax measure is a failing by SMSF trustees to properly formulate the fund’s investment strategy.“In our view it is completely unreasonable to expect trustees to envisage future tax changes when formulating the fund’s investment strategy – particularly of the magnitude of the Division 296 tax,” it stated.Mr Burgess added that to ensure this measure achieves its stated objectives, it is imperative that the measure of “earnings” mirrors the traditional measure of taxable earnings as closely as possible.The SMSFA said the two-week consultation period for the draft exposure legislation was too short stating the changes proposed are significant, complex and in need of detailed review.Additionally, it claimed other measures such as how the Division 296 tax will be applied to defined benefit funds and the proposal to remove the link between a member’s total superannuation balance and the transfer balance cap, are heavily reliant upon regulations not yet released.“This affects our ability to properly consider all aspects of the proposed measures,” it said.The submission also calls for the $3 million threshold to be indexed to the Consumer Price Index in $100,000 increments.The SMSFA is urging the government to put the proposed bill on hold while it further engages with stakeholders to ensure that the resulting policy and legislation deliver an outcome that is equitable across the superannuation system.
Keeli Cambourne
19 October 2023
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Women still outpacing men in SMSF establishments
- Economic and market outlook for 2025: Global summary
- Preparing to lodge quarterly January TBAR
- How to overcome your investment fears
- Navigating the outcome of the U.S. election
- Divorce doesn’t alter contribution rules
- $3m super tax officially abandoned for this year
- Top 20 Most Watched Christmas Movies ever - pre covid
- A Unique Advent Calendar
- ATO reviewing all new SMSF registrations to stop illegal early access
- Compliance documents crucial for SMSFs
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2024
- Leaving super to an estate makes more tax sense, says expert
- Be clear on TBA pension impact
- Caregiving can have a retirement sting
- The biggest assets growth areas for SMSFs
- 20 Years of Silicon Valley Trends: 2004 - 2024 Insights
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2024
- Economic slowdown drives mixed reporting season
- ATO stats show continued growth in SMSF sector
- What are the government’s intentions with negative gearing?
- A new day for Federal Reserve policy
- Age pension fails to meet retirement needs
- ASIC extends reportable situations relief and personal advice record-keeping requirements
- The Leaders Who Refused to Step Down 1939 - 2024
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
Article archive
October - December 2023 archive
- Working after pension age
- Does the NALI/E punishment fit the crime?
- EPOA crucial for SMSFs, says professional adviser
- Economic and market outlook for 2024: Global summary
- Five investing tips for beginners
- Setting up the next generations of retirees
- A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
- Most Expensive Wars In History
- ATO takes hard line on in-house asset rules
- How to budget using the 50/30/20 method
- SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2023
- The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
- Teaching children about the value of money
- Most powerful countries throughout time.
- Retirement is not just about dollars
- Unfair Terms in a Standard Form Contract
- Too many businesses roll the dice on tax debt: Jordan
- Revised NALE rules ‘miss chance to clarify SMSF bugbear
- 6 simple rules will ensure a deed can be executed in all states
- Our investment and economic outlook, September 2023
- The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
- High deposit rates, but the case for equities is strong
- Most powerful LEADERS of All Time