Downsizer age reduction now in force
With the eligibility age for downsizer contributions now age 55, the SMSF Association has highlighted some important considerations for younger clients looking to use the measure.
.
With Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Bill 2022 receiving royal assent in mid-December last year, the eligibility age for making downsizer contributions has now been reduced to age 55 as of 1 January this year. The eligibility age was previously 60.
This means that eligible individuals aged 55 years and older can now choose to make a downsizer contribution into their super fund of up to $300,000 per person or $600,000 per couple, from the proceeds of selling their home.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, SMSF Association deputy chief executive, Peter Burgess, said while the downsizer contributions measure has been a popular measure so far, it remains to be seen what the take-up will be among those under age 60.
Ms Burgess said it’s important that younger clients looking to use this measure are aware that there is only one opportunity to use it.
“For some clients it may be best to wait until they have another opportunity to use it later in life,” he explained.
Given that a downsizer contribution counts against an individual’s total super balance, Mr Burgess warned that making one of these contributions may impact a client’s ability to make contributions in the future.
“So, the timing around when you make a downsizer contribution is very important,” he cautioned.
Where a client is below the age of 65, Colonial First State senior technical manager, Tim Sanderson, previously warned that advisers and their clients also need to carefully consider the preservation age with these contributions.
“They won’t have access to the funds till after they meet a condition of release such as retirement which may not be until age 65,” Mr Sanderson said in a FirstTech podcast.
“You need to be very careful when considering whether or not they may need access to the funds because they may not be able to for up to 10 years.”
Advisers should also consider how much cash the client has to contribute to super and whether making a downsizer contribution is actually a viable strategy, he said.
“For many people, utilising the bring-forward rule and contributing up to $330,000 may be sufficient and allows clients to save their once off ability to make a downsizer contribution for the future,” he explained.
“On the other hand, if a couple has a lot of cash available, it may be advantageous to make a downsizer contribution in addition to a non-concessional contribution. This can be particularly tax effective for individuals who are still working and on a higher marginal tax rate.”
Miranda Brownlee
01 January 2023
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Women still outpacing men in SMSF establishments
- Economic and market outlook for 2025: Global summary
- Preparing to lodge quarterly January TBAR
- How to overcome your investment fears
- Navigating the outcome of the U.S. election
- Divorce doesn’t alter contribution rules
- $3m super tax officially abandoned for this year
- Top 20 Most Watched Christmas Movies ever - pre covid
- A Unique Advent Calendar
- ATO reviewing all new SMSF registrations to stop illegal early access
- Compliance documents crucial for SMSFs
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2024
- Leaving super to an estate makes more tax sense, says expert
- Be clear on TBA pension impact
- Caregiving can have a retirement sting
- The biggest assets growth areas for SMSFs
- 20 Years of Silicon Valley Trends: 2004 - 2024 Insights
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2024
- Economic slowdown drives mixed reporting season
- ATO stats show continued growth in SMSF sector
- What are the government’s intentions with negative gearing?
- A new day for Federal Reserve policy
- Age pension fails to meet retirement needs
- ASIC extends reportable situations relief and personal advice record-keeping requirements
- The Leaders Who Refused to Step Down 1939 - 2024
- ATO encourages trustees to use voluntary disclosure service
- Beware of terminal illness payout time frame
Article archive
January - March 2023 archive
- China’s economic rebound lowers the odds of a global recession
- No plans to extend NALI compliance relief, says ATO
- Why most investors want human advice
- Comparison: How Long It Takes To Decompose?
- Contribution caps to stay the same for 2023–24 year
- Three simple steps for financial wellness
- Draft super objective to ‘protect super from interference’
- Beating back inflation, but at what cost?
- Why superannuation fund fees matter
- 100 Most Influential people in the world.
- TBC set for double indexation from 1 July
- ATO issues fresh warning on illegal early access schemes
- When to be proactive about your portfolio
- Digital advice firm optimistic QAR will ‘reset financial advice’
- 2022 by the numbers
- ATO raises alarm on asset protection scheme for SMSFs
- Downsizer age reduction now in force
- SMSFs cautioned on ‘strict conditions’ with SMSF lending
- Countries with the highest GDP per capita between 1800-2040
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Auditor flags surprising traps with e-signatures and SMSFs
- A review of the last two decades in investing