ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test
The alternative decline in turnover test rules for the JobKeeper payment scheme has now been registered by the ATO.
The legislative instrument, Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Alternative Decline in Turnover Test Rules 2020, has now been registered.
The alternative tests will only kick in if an entity cannot satisfy the basic decline in turnover test.
The explanatory statement notes that the alternative tests will only apply to seven circumstances.
These include where an entity commenced business after the relevant comparison period in 2019 or the business did not exist in the relevant comparison period and as a result there was no relevant comparison period in 2019.
It will also cover a circumstance where an entity acquired or disposed of part of their business after the relevant comparison period in 2019, and where an entity has restructured part or all of their business after the relevant comparison period in 2019.
Entities who had an increase in turnover by 50 per cent or more in the 12 months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, or 25 per cent or more in the six months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, or 12.5 per cent or more in the three months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, will also be covered.
The alternative test will also cover entities affected by a drought or other natural disaster in the relevant comparison period in 2019, and entities who have an irregular turnover that is not cyclical, such as what can occur in the building and construction sector.
A sole trader or a small partnership where the sole trader or one of the partners did not work for all or part of the relevant comparison period because they were sick, injured or on leave during the relevant comparison period, and those circumstances affects the turnover of the sole trader or partnership, will also be covered.
Each of the seven circumstances has its own alternative test that is detailed in the legislative instrument.
“The commissioner cannot determine an alternative decline in turnover test in all circumstances,” said the explanatory statement.
“It is only in those circumstances where there is an event or circumstance, be it internal or external to an entity, that is outside the usual business setting for entities of that class which results in the relevant comparison period in 2019 not being appropriate for the purpose of an entity in the class of entities satisfying the decline in turnover test.”
Jotham Lian
24 April 2020
smsfadviser.com
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- SMSF assets reach record levels amid share market rally
- Many Australians have a fear of running out
- How to get into the retirement comfort zone
- NALE bill passed by parliament
- Compliance focus impacts wind-ups
- LRBA interest rates increase for 2025
- Income-free areas set to increase from 1 July
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Middle-to-higher incomes boosting SMSF growth
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2024
- Transitioning into retirement: What you should know
- Plan now to take advantage of stage 3 tax cuts
- Deeming freeze a win for Age Pensioners
- Downsizer contributions can be time critical
- The superannuation changes from 1 July
- The Deadliest pandemics in History
- Winners & Losers
- Budget breakdown – Federal Government Analysis
- Federal Budget 2024
- Getting to a higher level of financial literacy in Australia
- What is the future of advice and how far off is superannuation 2.0?
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2024
- Australia’s debt service ratio ‘extraordinary’: CBA
- Connecting an adviser with your children
- ACCC scam report
- The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
- ATO warns trustees about increasing crypto scams
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
April - June 2020 archive
- ‘HomeBuilder’ grants now available.
- Related-party property development concerns — Part 1
- The value of financial advice
- A super catch-up plan
- Court decides on taxable capital gains distributions
- SMSF liquidity lessons learnt from the pandemic
- Do your investment goals stack up?
- Retirement income framework deferred due to COVID-19
- How early super withdrawals add up
- AFP teams up with ATO, Treasury in COVID-19 tax fraud taskforce
- ATO extends initial JobKeeper payment deadline
- ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test
- Our Website, your resources
- Consumer satisfaction up for SMSFs, down for industry funds
- Superannuation for younger investors
- How to stay the course in retirement
- COVID-19: Early Childhood Education and Care Relief Package
- Government announces mandatory code for rent relief
- ATO clarifies COVID-19 rent relief concerns
- SMSFs in the ATO firing line
- Avoid SISR traps in early access to super scheme
- Data so large it's hard to comprehend.
- Ride the market to recovery
- Historic $130bn wage subsidy to cover 6 million workers
- Stage 2 – Covid-19 stimulus package.